Cara Dudley, Witness for the State
|
MR. PANOSH: Ms. Young. Stephanie Young.
Ms. Dudley.
CARA DUDLEY, being first duly sworn, testified as follows during
DIRECT EXAMINATION by MR. PANOSH:
Q Would you state your name, please.
A Cara Dudley.
MR. PANOSH: Your Honor, this witness also is covered by the motion
in limine.
THE COURT: All right.
Members of the jury, you need to step out again, please.
(The jury left
the courtroom at 2:40 p.m.)
THE COURT: All right, sir.
VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION by MR. PANOSH:
Q Were you acquainted with Patricia Kimble before her death?
A Yes, sir.
Q How did
you know her?
A We met in
the fall of '91 at church. We became good friends. When I married in
'92, she was in my wedding. And when she got married, I was her
matron of honor.
Q And that
would have been May of '94; is that right?
A When they
married?
Q Yes.
680
A In the -- in the church wedding, yes. But they had actually
married earlier.
Q Did there
come a time in the weeks preceding, two or three weeks preceding her
death, when Patricia Kimble called you or spoke to you?
A Yes. We talked frequently, and there were several conversations
in the weeks preceding her death.
Q And in
one of those -- does one of those conversations stand out in your
mind?
A Yes.
Q Would you
relate that to the Court, please.
A She
called one evening. Her voice was shaky. She wanted me to know --
she was very upset. In case anything strange ever happened to her,
she wanted me to know that she had discovered by accident that Ted
had taken out a large insurance policy on her, without her
knowledge. She said, "I did not sign it. He must have forged my
name." And she said, "I know of no checks that have been written to
pay for such a policy, that he must have paid cash for the policy."
She did not understand why he wanted such money -- so much money.
They already had some insurance. She felt that that was very
adequate, that all of this extra was -- she just couldn't understand
why he wanted so much. She kept saying he would have so much money
left over, even after everything was paid off, that he would just
have this large
681
sum of money, and she just could not understand why he wanted so
much.
Q Did she
also talk to you, make specific reference to a motorcycle?
A Yes. She
was upset because Ted wanted to buy something again, something more,
this motorcycle. She didn't understand why a married man wanted a
motorcycle to cruise High Point Road with. She just didn't think
that was something, because he wanted to go cruising High Point
Road, and she just didn't understand why a married man would want to
do something like that. That was just not a married thing to do.
Q Did she
indicate to you whether or not she would allow him to purchase it?
A She
indicated that he had gotten the second job so that he could buy a
motorcycle. He wanted the extra money, so that he could buy the
motorcycle.
Q Other
than characterizing her voice as shaking, what did you determine --
or what did you perceive about her demeanor?
A She was
scared. She did state she didn't want to believe that he would do
anything to her, but she just didn't know. She just wanted someone
to know what she had found out, in case, as she had stated to me,
anything strange ever happened to her.
682
MR. PANOSH: That would be the substance, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Do you wish to cross-examine the witness, Mr. Lloyd?
MR. LLOYD: No,
Your Honor.
THE COURT: Do
you wish to be heard?
MR. LLOYD:
Just very briefly, Judge.
Judge, I made all the arguments before, we've all heard them, and
I'm not going to replow that ground. One thing I would like to say
to the Court that I probably didn't say before, that maybe I should
have, it is very difficult for us, in the situation of defending
Ronnie Kimble, when all these hearsay statements come up, which
basically concern Ted Kimble. They don't have anything to do with
us. And that's one of the problems these particular witnesses pose
for us. And that's why it's distinguishable from these cases that
Mr. Panosh has cited. We're talking -- those statements went
directly to the defendant at trial. We don't have that situation
here, Your Honor. And I would reiterate -- I'm not going to replow
the ground we've already been over, but I would ask the Court to
consider it. And it puts us in virtually an impossible situation
here, because we represent Ronnie Kimble, we don't represent Ted
Kimble.
THE COURT: Mr.
Panosh?
683
MR. PANOSH: Your Honor, I made all the arguments before. We think
it's extremely important to our case. We have to show a motive on
the part of Ted, to show that he convinced this man to pull the
trigger. And this definitely goes to his motive. It's admissible as
to her state of mind.
THE COURT: Okay. The Court's going to find that the statements made
by Cara Dudley are admissible under the hearsay exception under Rule
803(3), existing mental state. These conversations were two to three
weeks prior to the
death, that
they involved an emotional state of the victim, and her feelings,
the fact that she was scared. And this is admissible, in that the
Court finds the probative value would outweigh any prejudicial
value. I will, however, instruct the court (sic) about they must
consider this only in the event that there is a -- the State has
proven beyond a reasonable doubt there is a conspiracy and this
defendant was part of that conspiracy.
Bring them back.
(The jury
entered the courtroom at 2:46 p.m.)
THE COURT: Members of the jury, the Court will caution you about the
testimony of this witness, from the standpoint that her testimony
may involve statements made by Ted Kimble, and the Court would again
remind you that these statements would only be considered against
this defendant
684
in
the event that you should find the State has established beyond a
reasonable doubt that there was a conspiracy, and that Ted Kimble
and this defendant were co-conspirators. Otherwise, you're not to
consider this against this defendant, if you do not find the
conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt. And that's the extent that I
can tell you about it right now.
Proceed.
CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION by MR. PANOSH:
Q Ms.
Dudley, did you know Patricia Kimble prior to her death?
A Yes, sir.
Q How did
you meet her?
A We met in
the fall of '91 at South Elm Street Baptist Church. We became good
friends. When I married in '92, she was in my wedding. And when she
married, her church wedding, in May of '95, I believe --
Q '94.
A '94. I
was her matron -- or maid of -- matron, yes. I was married then,
matron. And we talked quite frequently. We were very close friends.
Q In the two to three weeks preceding her death, did there come a
time when she called you on the telephone?
A Yes, sir.
Q And of
those telephone conversations, is there one that
685
stands
out
in your mind?
A Yes, sir.
Q Would you tell the ladies and gentlemen of the jury about that
telephone conversation.
A She
called me, and she wanted me to know that in case anything strange
ever happened to her, that she had discovered by accident about a
large insurance policy that Ted had taken out on her. Her voice was
shaky, as mine is now, when she was relaying this to me. She just
wanted someone to know, in case anything strange happened to her,
that this large policy had been taken out. She did not understand
why he wanted such a large policy, they already had insurance. She
said he would have so much money left over, even after everything
was paid off, if he got this large policy, which he had done, taken
out. She said, "I never signed anything. He must have forged my
name." She said, "He must have paid cash for the policy," also. She
did not know of any checks that had been written to pay for such a
policy. She just did not understand why he wanted so much money, to
have so much money, if something ever happened to her. They, she
already felt, had adequate insurance.
Q Did she state to you whether or not -- how this information
caused her to feel?
A She was
very upset. She did not want to believe that
686
Ted would do anything to her, because she loved him so much. But she
just didn't know -- she just didn't know what to believe. And she
just wanted to make sure that someone knew what was going on, in
case anything strange, as she stated, ever happened to her.
Q Other
than describing her voice as shaking, could you describe her
demeanor.
A She was
upset. She just -- I think she couldn't believe it. She just could
not believe what was going on. She was definitely trying not to cry.
She was trying to make sure I understood everything she was telling
me.
Q In the
course of that conversation, did she discuss with you the -- a
motorcycle?
A That same
week we had talked, she was -- she didn't -again, Ted had gotten a
second job. He wanted -apparently, part of it was to use the money
he had got at the second job to buy a motorcycle. She didn't
understand why he wanted a motorcycle to go cruising High Point
Road, because married men don't do that kind of a thing. She just --
she didn't understand why he wanted that motorcycle.
Q She said
that she had discovered it by accident. Did she say how she
discovered it?
A The
insurance man had called her. She had thought at the beginning of
the conversation that it was about, she mentioned dental insurance,
that they had taken out some
687
other insurance. But come to find out, within the conversation she
had with --
MR. LLOYD: Well, object to this, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. PANOSH: No further questions. Thank you, ma'am.
CROSS-EXAMINATION by MR. HATFIELD:
Q Ms.
Dudley --
A Yes, sir.
Q -- how
long have you been married?
A Six years
on Saturday.
Q And I
believe you said that Patricia was married in May of 1994?
A Her church
wedding was then, but they were actually married secretly in
December the year before.
Q You
participated in the church wedding?
A Yes, sir.
Q But you
didn't know anything about the secret wedding in Danville, Virginia,
did you?
A No, I did
know about it. She told me Christmas Eve the -- after the wedding.
Q So just a few
days after the secret wedding, she told you?
A Yes, she
did.
Q Did you
tell anybody else?
688
A My mother and
my husband.
Q Was the
understanding to keep it a --
A Yes.
Q --
relative secret?
A I did
encourage her to tell her family. I thought she needed to go ahead
and get it out in the open. But she did not choose to do so.
Q Do you know
why she and Ted got married in December secretly?
A I questioned
her on that. She said that they thought it would be good for taxes.
Q So Patricia
was a very business oriented and conservative young woman about
money?
A Yes, she
was.
Q And yet,
she was also very successful, wasn't she?
A I'm
sorry. I don't understand.
Q Well, I'm
sorry. She was pretty successful with money, too, wasn't she?
A Yes, she
was. She did quite well with it.
Q And you say
that in your conversations with her shortly before she died, that
she indicated that she and Ted had no financial problem?
A No, they
did not have financial problems.
Q And your
impression was that her belief was, they could easily live within
the means that they had; is that right?
689
A Within, yes.
Q And
therefore, that she couldn't understand why Ted would want this
part-time job that would keep him away from home in the evening?
A Correct.
Q Do you
know when he began that part-time job?
A I'm not
sure, sir.
Q Well, even
after he got the job, he and Patricia continued to take their
weekend trips, didn't they?
A I don't
know when he took the job, so I don't know what occurred after --
you know, during the time period he had the job.
Q But isn't it
a fact that Ted and Patricia took many weekend trips?
A Oh,
during the time, yes, that they were married, they
took --
Q During
the time they were married?
A Yes.
Q Both
church-related trips, on retreats and things --
A Uh-huh.
Q -- of
that sort --
A Yes.
Q -- and just
entertainment trips to Williamsburg and things like that?
A I
remember mostly she talking about Florida, going to
690
Disney.
Q Do you
know how many times she and Ted did that?
A I would
like to -- I think there were probably about two times. I'm not
really sure.
Q Did
Patricia tell you that she bought a timeshare house up in
Williamsburg, Virginia?
A No, sir,
she never told me that.
Q She never
told you that?
A No, sir.
Q Did you know
that she and Ted had gone up there on several occasions?
A I did not
always know where they were going. I knew they went on trips.
Q Did you
know that even before she married Ted, that Williamsburg was one of
her favorite places to visit?
A I don't
remember her stating that.
Q Did you
know her when she bought her house on Brandon Station Court?
A Ever
since I knew her, she had that home.
Q And of
course, that was her home in her own name, and not in Ted's name,
wasn't it?
A She owned
it before they married, so I assumed it was in her name.
Q Did you
know that she borrowed a large sum of money against that house to
buy this timeshare apartment up in
691
Williamsburg?
A No, sir,
I did not know that.
Q Did she
ever complain to you about this Jeep Cherokee that she and Ted
bought?
A All that
she ever stated about the Cherokee was, she didn't understand why
Ted had to have so many options on it. There were like, I think she
said somewhere in the range of almost $4,000 of options that he had
to have on this Jeep.
Q So he was
the more flamboyant, and she was the more conservative?
A Yes, sir.
Q Now, but
about the boat, she loved it, didn't she?
A They --
yeah, and they loved going with the -- they went out a lot on it.
Q So she spent
a lot of time with Ted, even though he did have this part-time job
at Precision?
A They
spent a lot of time, especially with the church groups, together
with the church groups. There were a lot of gatherings at their
home. When they had a -- we had lake trips with the church, I'm sure
the boat and them -- they went on it all together.
Q Without
talking about anything that she may have said to you, I would just
like to know if she ever discussed any of her personal relationships
with people she knew before she married Ted.
692
A Are you
referring to any type of boyfriend?
Q Did she
-- I don't want you to tell about it, I just want to know if she had
-- if she discussed her concerns at any time in earlier years.
A I never
knew her to date anyone, except for Ted.
Q And other
than the time you're talking about, a couple of weeks before she
died in September of 1995, did she ever have a telephone
conversation with you where she'd seemed emotional and upset?
A Well, she
died in October.
Q I'm
sorry?
A You said
September. She died in October.
Q Yeah, she
died in October.
A Oh.
Q She talked to
you in September of 1995 on the telephone?
A Yes.
Okay.
Q Other than
that particular telephone call that you've already told about --
A Uh-huh.
Q -- were there
any other telephone calls where she was really upset?
A She was
upset at one point, she called, when we were talking, that somebody
had come by Lyles and had offered some stereo equipment for sale for
a very few hundred
693
dollars, and Ted
had told her about it, and she told Ted, "Don't buy it. It's got to
be stolen. There's no way you get all this stereo equipment for free
--" or for, not free, what she considered free, but for just a
couple hundred dollars. But he gave the money to one of the
gentlemen that worked there at Lyles, sent him to get the equipment.
Ted told Patricia and Patricia told me that the guy went there, gave
the person the money that was supposed to go get this equipment for
exchange, but the guy never showed back up.
Q So Ted was a
fool and just lost his money?
MR. PANOSH: We'd
object, please.
THE COURT:
Sustained.
Q The upshot of
your story is, Ted lost his money; is that right?
A In the
end, he ended up with nothing, yes.
Q He ended
up with nothing?
A Yes.
Q But what
I was asking you about was, whether on any other occasion, except
that one time in September of 1995, when you were talking to
Patricia on the telephone, did she seem emotional and upset.
A Well,
that conversation I just told you about, she was upset with Ted at
that point.
Q So she was
upset with Ted at that time because he had lost several hundred
dollars?
694
A Her main
upset with him was that he was getting involved in something that
she considered that would be illegal, buying stolen merchandise.
Q And when
was that conversation?
A It was in
-- within the last two or three weeks before she died, also. Because
the night she called, Ted was at his job. So I'm thinking it was
sometime in those last couple of weeks or month -- maybe a month.
I'm not sure.
Q So in the
conversation about the stereo equipment, was Patricia crying?
A No, she was
not crying. She was upset, though, you could tell. She had a heated
voice, and she was --
Q Well, was she
upset because she was a good and sensible business manager, and she
just didn't like to see money lost unnecessarily?
A She was
mostly upset about the fact that what he was involved in was what
she felt was illegal. I think she was most upset by that fact, more
than the money.
Q So she was
disappointed in what she found out about his character?
A Yes, sir.
Q Now, when she
called in this time in September, what time of day was it?
A It was
evening.
Q Did she
call you or did you call her?
695
A She called
me.
Q Were you
alone?
A No. I was
at home with my husband and son.
Q How
long did you and she talk?
A It was not a
very long conversation. Probably 15, 20 minutes.
Q Did she
launch right into her talk about Ted, or did she talk about other
things?
A Pretty
much went right into that.
Q After you
hung up the phone, did you feel that you should maybe talk to
somebody about Patricia?
A I told my
husband. And then several days later, I told my mother, also,
because I was concerned.
Q Did you
tell your pastor?
A No, I did
not.
Q Did you
mention this conversation to Patricia again?
A We never
had the opportunity to speak alone about it.
Q But she
was virtually your best friend.
A She was one
of my closest friends. But we did not have an opportunity to speak
alone about it after that conversation.
Q But Ted
was at Precision every week night. You could have called her any
week night.
A Sir, I
have a full-time job, a husband and a child. My evenings are -- were
very busy. At the time, I was
696
pregnant, too. So
I had a lot going on in my life and was not able to probably keep up
with her like I should have, especially after that conversation. I
will regret that always.
Q Now that
the terrible thing has happened to Patricia, it seems awful that you
didn't follow up, doesn't it?
A Thank you
for pointing that out again, sir.
Q I'm not
trying to -- I'm trying to do my job in this courtroom. I'm not
trying to hurt your feelings.
MR. PANOSH: Object
to the comments of counsel.
THE COURT:
Sustained. Don't make any comments, Mr. Hatfield. Just ask your
questions.
Q You were
very busy during that time. Did you -- was there anything about your
activities that would let you help us know when in September this
happened?
A It would
have been very late in September. The night she called, I was
installing carpet in my bathroom. That carpet had been purchased
several weeks earlier from Piedmont Salvage. And it was about three
weeks, because I wasn't feeling real good at that point in the
pregnancy. And that night she called, I was in the bathroom
installing the carpet.
I also a couple
days later told my mother. And then a couple of days after that, my
mother left on a cruise. And when she returned, she returned the day
of the funeral -- or
697
the memorial
service at church.
Q So how
long was the cruise?
A It was a
week.
Q So this
call would have been perhaps two weeks before Patricia died or --
A About ten
days when I talked to my mother. So it was probably three days
before that, so 13, 14 days before her death. I'm not specific of
the actual date, but that's --
Q Did you
stay in touch with Patricia's relatives after she passed away?
A We've
seen each other at church quite frequently.
Q Don't you
know that there was no insurance policy on her life?
MR. PANOSH: We
object, please.
THE COURT:
Sustained.
Q What
information do you have about whether there actually was an
insurance policy on her life?
A That it
-- I had known through the testimony that I've heard of --
MR. PANOSH: Well,
we --
A -- and
through the newspaper --
MR. PANOSH: Object
to what happened in the newspaper, please.
THE COURT:
Sustained.
Q Don't you
know, and didn't you know before this trial
698
started, that
there never was an insurance policy?
MR. PANOSH:
Objection.
THE COURT:
Sustained.
MR. HATFIELD: May
I take one moment? THE COURT: Yes, sir.
(Time was
allowed for Mr. Hatfield.)
Q You said that
Patricia was opposed to her husband getting a motorcycle?
A Uh-huh.
Q But her basis
for that was, she just thought motorcycles were dangerous; isn't
that right?
A She
thought they were dangerous, and she didn't understand why he needed
something. They just -- they had the boat, they had the new Jeep. It
was just another expenditure that he was making, that he may --
spent money quite frequently, that that bothered her.
Q But she
also told you that they had adequate money and didn't need more
money?
A She felt
like they did not need any more money. But the fact is that Ted
wanted to purchase more.
Q Wasn't it --
wasn't the matter of the motorcycle settled because they bought the
Cherokee, with the --
A I'm not
--
Q --
understanding that --
A -- aware
of that.
699
Q -- he would
forget about the motorcycle?
A I've
never heard that stated.
Q Are you
sure that on that conversation a couple of weeks before she died,
she was talking about the motorcycle?
A I'm
sorry. I'm --
Q Are you
sure that on that one conversation in September, a few days before
your mom went on her cruise, that Patricia was actually talking
about the motorcycle?
A The few
days before the cruise was when I told my mother about the
conversation I'd had about the insurance policy with --
Q All
right.
A -- with
Patricia.
Q But isn't
it possible that your recollections of Patricia's opposition to Ted
buying a motorcycle go back quite a bit further?
A I don't
believe so, sir. It was just -- it was a conversation -- a
conversation right prior to the conversation in regards to the
insurance.
Q So you're
saying that she told you that she had gotten word from an insurance
man that a policy was being negotiated for or purchased on her life?
You did say that, didn't you?
A She had
-- well, when he called, he began talking about a policy, and she
thought it was the dental, but somewhere
700
within the
conversation, it came to her knowledge that it was not the dental
that he was speaking of, that it was a large insurance -- life
insurance policy.
Q Right.
And what I'm asking you is, isn't it possible that she just made no
reference to a motorcycle when she was saying these things to you
that day, that the motorcycle was
A No, sir. No.
Q She was
not?
A She was
definitely talking about an insurance policy.
Q I
understand she was talking about an insurance policy. Are you sure
she was talking about a motorcycle?
A The prior
conversation before that? Yes, sir.
Q Now, you said
that she mentioned to you that there'd been break-ins at her house?
A Yes.
Q How many
break-ins at her house had there been, of your knowledge?
A I believe
there were two.
Q Was she
married to Ted when both of those took place? A I believe they
were both before her marriage.
Q So, once Ted
moved in with her, he took steps to protect the house from further
break-ins?
A I'm not
sure -- I know he had helped put a lock back on at one point. I
don't know what other steps he took.
701
Q Do you
know whether they bought a burglar alarm system? A I don't know
anything of that.
Q Do you
know whether Patricia was actively involved in the management of
Lyles, the building business?
A She had
done the books at one time, but Ted had kind of pushed her out of
doing the books.
Q But she
had something to do with helping to purchase it, didn't she?
A Lyles?
The little bit I know about the purchase of it was that her -- his
parents, I believe, had taken out like a second mortgage, to help
them purchase the business.
Q Do you
know whether Patricia had made any arrangements with the insurance
man to make sure there was insurance to cover those debts?
A I know
nothing of that.
Q So, even
though you and she were best friends, you really didn't discuss the
Kimble finances, did you? A Not about the business or anything
like that, no, sir.
Q Do you
know whether, after you had your conversation with Patricia about
the insurance, that maybe she confronted her husband, Ted, and that
they had some conversations about that themselves?
A I don't
know what occurred after that. I never did get to speak with her
again on the policy in any way, shape or form.
702
MR. HATFIELD:
Thank you very much.
THE COURT:
Step down, ma'am.
(The witness
left the witness stand.)
|