|
Agreement, State of North Carolina v. Patrick Roy Pardee
|
Ted's handwritten
notes are included as footnotes
220
STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GUILFORD
IN THE GENERAL
COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
cases to be indicted
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
PATRICK ROY PARDEE
DEFENDANT
AGREEMENT
and N.C.Gen.Stat. 15A-1054
Disclosure
The Parties to this criminal action
hereby stipulate and agree to the following facts:
1. That the defendant is charged with several counts of breaking and
entry and larceny and may be charged with related offenses, which
are also property crimes by way of indictment on or about November
3, 1997.
2. That the defendant has offered and agreed to testify in regard to
the death of Patricia Kimble and to the involvement of Theodore
Kimble in various crimes related to breaking and entry and
larcenies. That the defendant has been interviewed by his attorney
and stated that he has information to offer in these cases, and that
said information directly points to the guilt of Theodore Kimble,
Ronnie Kimble, or Robert H. Nicholes and is direct and personal
knowledge of the type the State of North Carolina can use in its
prosecution of Theodore Kimble, Ronnie Kimble, or Robert H. Nicholes.
3. That based upon that interview, the defendant's attorney, Joseph
A. Williams, has agreed to make his client available to the law
enforcement officers to interrogate.
4. That the defendant has cooperated and given statements to
officers of the Guilford County Sheriffs Department, the Greensboro
Police Department, and the State Bureau of Investigation on various
occasions, including, but not limited to, April 7, 1997, May 27,
1997, July 15, 1995, July 21, 1997, July 28, 1997, July 31, 997.
That the defendant has agreed to continue to cooperate and provide
information in regard to the aforementioned investigations.
5. That the defendant has assisted law enforcement officers in
identifying, recovering and returning property stolen by Theodore
Mead Kimble and Robert H. Nicholes to the rightful owners of said
property.
6. That the defendant has voluntarily submitted to a polygraph
examination to corroborate some of the information given to law
enforcement officials.
7. That at the time the defendant offered and gave cooperation there
was no agreement between the defendant and the State of North
Carolina. Officers of the various law enforcement agencies did
inform the defendant that his cooperation would be of direct benefit
to him in the resolution of the pending cases and that the nature
and extent of the benefit would be determined by the District
Attorney's Office.
1
221
Based upon the
aforegoing facts, the State of North Carolina hereby agrees on this
Friday, October 31, 1997, that in the event that the defendant,
Patrick Roy Pardee, agrees to continue to cooperate with officers of
the Guilford County Sheriffs Department, the State Bureau of
Investigation and the Greensboro Police Department, and testifies if
called upon, in a truthful manner, consistent with his previous
statements to the Guilford County Sheriffs Department and Greensboro
Police Department, the State of North Carolina will recommend that
he receive a probationary sentence. It is the understanding of the
parties that the defendant, through counsel, will at the appropriate
time, request the sentencing court to consider the first offender
program for the defendant, if he is otherwise eligible.
In return, the defendant, Patrick Roy Pardee, agrees:
1. That he will voluntarily appear and testify in any trial related
to the death of Patricia Kimble.
2. That he will voluntarily appear and testify in any trial related
to breaking and entry or larceny crimes involving Theodore Kimble or
Robert H. Nicholes.
3. That he will continue to assist law enforcement officers in
identifying, recovering and returning property stolen by Theodore
Mead Kimble to the rightful owners of said property.
4. That said testimony shall be truthful, complete and not
inconsistent with the prior statements of the defendant to the
Greensboro Police Department, the Guilford County Sheriffs
Department and the State Bureau of Investigation.
The defendant, Patrick Roy Pardee, understands that if he fails to
cooperate as set forth in this agreement the State of North Carolina
shall have the option of moving to set aside this plea agreement,
and prosecute the defendant to the fullest extent allowed by the
law. That the defendant consents and agrees that the State of North
Carolina shall have the right to move to set aside his plea
agreement and sentence in the event that the defendant willfully
fails to comply with this agreement.
Further the Defendant, Patrick Roy Pardee, agrees to take a
polygraphA
or participate in other law enforcement activities designed to
corroborate his testimony.
The defendant, Patrick Roy Pardee, understands that he must be
totally truthful in his cooperation with the State of North
Carolina, and that if the defendant, Patrick Roy Pardee lies or
intentionally omits or misstates the facts of the death of Patricia
Kimble, or his knowledge of the facts leading up to the death of
Patricia Kimble, or if he refuses to testify or intentionally
submits false testimony, the State of North Carolina will not be
bound by this agreement and that the State of North Carolina will
use his statements to prosecute him to the fullest extent of the
law.
The Defendant understands that this agreement is limited to property
crimes, and that if in the course of the investigation it is
determined that he has participated as a principle or an accessory
in any crime against a person,B
this agreement does not protect the defendant from prosecution for
that crime against a person. Further, if in the course of the
investigation it is determined that he has participated as a
principle or an accessory in any crime against a person, his
statements and any information gained or uncovered as a result of
his statement is can be used to prosecute him to the fullest extent
of the law.
Further, this agreement only binds the District Attorney's Office of
Guilford County and is not intended to bind or affect or hinder the
decision of any other prosecutorial agency, state or federal to
indict and prosecute the Defendant, Patrick Roy Pardee and that this
agreement does not prohibit said prosecution.
2
AAre we
entitled to the results? How about our own test?
BNote how
the threat of prosecution is involved. Patrick feared they
would charge him for the crime. He told me so.
PDF
|
|